Aquarium Plants - Barr Report  
Go Back   Aquarium Plants - Barr Report > Barr Report > General Plant Topics
Reload this Page Nu-Clear
General Plant Topics General Plant Topics and Aquatic Life discussions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Nu-Clear
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
inkslinger is Offline
Guru Class Expert
Poster
Nu-Clear - 01-04-2009, 10:46 PM

Is the Nu-Clear 506 w/o Media the same as 547 w/Bio Balls?
I don't have the room but has any one mix these filter with any extension , Let's say a 533 with a 1547 extension, I was just wondering?
Because every where i see these filter they say not to mix with different extension but all the canister filters look to be built the same but with different media?
I gust the best way to run the 533 and 547 {or506} would be in line together with the 533 first.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Gerryd is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Approaching Guru Status
Location: South Florida
01-05-2009, 01:51 AM

Inkslinger,

I THINK that many of the NC models have the same basic canister size, but since the FLOW rates for the media is different, I can see why they would not recommend switching model/extensions.

From one of the links:

Quote:
Nu-Clear filters feature heavy duty molded PVC construction with a stainless steel lid clamp for secure leak free operation and carry a 2 year guarantee. The filter bodies are approximately 13" wide and 12.5" tall (overall width with fittings is 15”). An additional clearance of 8” above the filter is required to remove the cartridge for cleaning. Nu-Clear filters have 1" FNPT inlet and outlet ports allowing for higher flow rates (up to 1,200 gallons/hr) than similar filters with 3/4” ports. All models come with adapters for 3/4" and 1" hose, stainless steel hose clamps, Teflon tape, and a drain valve.

Inland Seas Aquarium and Pond Products: Nu-Clear Modular Canister Filters

It SEEMS that you could discard any of the media for the NC models and have a 506, except for possibly flow rates.....

The extension basically is like putting one NC on top of another.

You can run the two models in series as you say you want, but also parallel and rejoin the flows at the OUTPUT of the canisters and back to the tank. The first filter will clog and the second one in line will simply get less flow when run in series, so it is more limited options IMO.....

I am awating delivery on my 547 NC and will most likely install in parallel with my NC 533 and have my mazzei AFTER the 546.......so, pump to T, leg 1 to ball valve and NC 546 and mazzei (with bypass loop), leg 2 to ball valve and NC 533, then merge both back using a second T, and then to dual returns to tank. Am playing with the though of also stuffing a 522 in front of the bio/mazzei leg (nc 522/nc 547/mazzei ) but not sure if my pump can handle OR I have the room LOL

I assume that the 533 will clog sooner than the bio/venturi leg and thus force MORE pressure to the bio/venturi, so will have to watch as the 533 PSI guage goes up......
am pretty sure Tom has reported this on his starfire build.................I think he is setup this way in parallel.

The site above does mention slower flow rates/less clogging on some of the models in comparison to the purely mech models like the 533 and no need of cartride BLEACHNG, so I think mixing and matching could be problematic.

I wish the 547 came with a PSI guage but I don't see it included........I will install a guage on this leg......

I may fill a portion of the 547 with ceramic rings instead of the bio-balls............

Hope this helps.

Good luck with your choice/setup!


Gerry.

Last edited by Gerryd : 01-05-2009 at 02:04 AM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
JDowns is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Poster
01-05-2009, 02:08 AM

The inside bottoms are different.

The cartridge canisters are designed so the center matching the cartridge is the flow out.

The 547 has a solid bottom with multiple holes for even flow throughout the canister to the output.

So they are different in the internal design per application.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
inkslinger is Offline
Guru Class Expert
Poster
01-07-2009, 01:02 AM

So is it best to run the 547 after the 533 because the 533 will filter an polish the water an clog up first an the bio balls will filter the water by bacteria means . I still want to get is In Line Heater {Heaters the only place that offers Custom fitted for Titanium heaters with bushing and centering collar for in line module} , CO2 Reactor and UV Light.
Should I run the last 3 in series with the 2 Filters would it slow the flow down a lot or go 2 leg parallel ?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
JDowns is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Poster
01-07-2009, 01:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by inkslinger View Post
So is it best to run the 547 after the 533 because the 533 will filter an polish the water an clog up first an the bio balls will filter the water by bacteria means . I still want to get is In Line Heater {Heaters the only place that offers Custom fitted for Titanium heaters with bushing and centering collar for in line module} , CO2 Reactor and UV Light.
Should I run the last 3 in series with the 2 Filters would it slow the flow down a lot or go 2 leg parallel ?


I ran mine in series 533 then the 547. I only noticed a half a psi difference with the addition of the 547. What pump are you running, the 55? I can't find the thread from the other discussion. Be nice to consolidate this here. What pump, size tank, number of outputs inside tank. Then Gerry can answer all your questions

I ended up dumping the bio mine came with and use ZeoSand. But thats another experiment all together.

I would think you want the UV on its own leg though. This way you can regulate the flow through the UV with a ball valve to match its flow rating. Personally I would run the UV after the 533 so cleaner water is processed, cutting down on the maintenance of the UV.

Also set up your system on paper to make maintenance and options as optimal as possible. Ie ball valves, unions, true wyes, etc.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
inkslinger is Offline
Guru Class Expert
Poster
01-07-2009, 12:20 PM

sorry i thought i did have that info: Tank is a 110g tank , close loop is 1 inch ,Blue Line 55 HD 1100gph 2 return -1inch to 3/4 inch to 1/2inch Y split {Loc Line} but if I do get rid of my Eheim Pro 2 2028 I will add another return with the Y split
Just got my NC 533 Today very nice filter I'm empress

Last edited by inkslinger : 01-07-2009 at 06:14 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Gerryd is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Approaching Guru Status
Location: South Florida
01-07-2009, 06:51 PM

Inkslinger,

Just to complicate things, you know that Ocean Clear canister have units with a built-in UV and or heater? I think Tom uses the UV one. May be worth a look to combine some components....

With all your components, I would run parallel with the NC 533 on one leg and the bio-filter (???) and c02 device (??) on the other leg. Combine both of these and run that flow through the heater so all water is filtered one way or the other and then heated.

Then you can install a UV on each or one of the RETURN lines. This way all the filtered/c02 enriched/heated water is combined before it goes to the tank. One return could handle the slower UV flow and the rest sent to the other return without restriction.

If the heater is too little flow rated for the return, put a small heater on one return line and the UV on the other. You will lose some flow but add a powerhead for more current/flow.

I would keep the eheim until the bio filter is underway then remove it. You will not need it IMO/IME if the NC is run properly..........

After some consideration I did not use a UV as I had planned and am glad I did not. I have seen no need for it so far.

I think the 533 and 547 would give you plenty of filtration with no need for a UV for your size tank.

Hope this helps.

P.S. Jdowns will take the next set of questions


Gerry.

Last edited by Gerryd : 01-07-2009 at 07:00 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
JDowns is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Poster
01-07-2009, 11:31 PM

I agree with Gerry's points.

I would definatly look into the Ocean Clears with the built in UV / Heaters. That would simplify things. If you already have the Nu-Clear units then that idea is bust. I fully agree that you should setup the UV and Heater so polished water is running through them. A ball valve prior to the UV and CO2 I think would be a must so you can regulate that flow for optimum performance. For the UV to match its flow rating (to fast and you might as well not even plumb it ). For the reactor also so you can optimize dissolution.

I run mine in series, while Gerry, Tom, and others in parallel. I think that shows you can have sucess with either setup.

With the amount of configurations Gerry has tried I think he has found the sweet spot in that type of setup.

Definatly keep the canister running until the NuClear bio unit is established.

As for the UV if you can plumb your system so it can be added at a later date easily that is the route I would go. But thats from my own experience of not needing one (knock on wood).

Also with that pump and the NuClear type units your going to have plenty of flow and turn over. When I finally get rid of my 9.5's in parallel that is the pump rating I will be going with.

Last edited by JDowns : 01-07-2009 at 11:34 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
inkslinger is Offline
Guru Class Expert
Poster
01-08-2009, 03:28 AM

JDowns did i read some where that you are running DIY CO2 Reactor if so what is the size 2x15 ? I was thinking of running a 3x24 Reactor or just tap out my Aqua Medic 1000 Reactor for a 1 inch hook up like this:
http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/d.../plumbing3.jpg

Just got to fig out what size bits he use?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
JDowns is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Poster
01-08-2009, 04:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by inkslinger View Post
JDowns did i read some where that you are running DIY CO2 Reactor if so what is the size 2x15 ? I was thinking of running a 3x24 Reactor or just tap out my Aqua Medic 1000 Reactor for a 1 inch hook up like this:
http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/d.../plumbing3.jpg

Just got to fig out what size bits he use?


Right now I'm experimenting with 2 different methods.

1. Half Co2 through a diffuser fed into a Mag 5 that pushes the mist around the tank. Half fed into the input prior to the pumps feeding the Nu-Clear units.

2. All Co2 through a diffuser fed into a Mag 5 that pushes the mist around the tank.


The Nu-Clears act as a reactor, disolving the CO2 entirely. Way to early in this new setup to decern any noticable difference. Things are still settling in.

Although with the past setup when the tank was jam packed full of plants with adequate leaf space to catch CO2 mist. Setup 2 seemed to produce the best results. I got much better coloration, less lower leaf loss, and my mosses seemed to do better.

I use to hate the mist look. But the plant health outweighed the viewing discomfort. I'm use to the look now that it doesn't bother me. Healthier plants + Mist > Poor plants + No Mist in my book. Thats not to say you can't have healthy plants without mist. It just works better in my setup. Don't be afraid to experiment with different methods. Just make sure to make adjustements slowly over a few weeks time to be able to view fauna and plant growth differences. Also lower light during experimentation is wise. Once you find the sweet spot then you can increase lighting safer.

Last edited by JDowns : 01-08-2009 at 04:29 AM. Reason: Its Nip Thirty so my use of prepositions is waining
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On

Points Per Thread View:
Points Per Thread:
Points Per Reply:



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80