Borman, the tank has very little plant biomass.
I would really consider doing more frequent water changes.
This will not help the BBA.
Peroxide sort of works, but it can kill plants and fish as well if you add too much.
Be very careful.
I prune BBA off and with good fast plant growth, have never had an issue in the last 15 years or so.
It's generally CO2 almost every time.
The Riccia is a nice plant to help you here with CO2.
If you see bubbles on the Riccia about 1-2 hours into the light cycle, then you are in goods shape.
Also, notice how the Riccia looks after a water change. do the water change in the morning right after the light's come on.
Compare the amount of growth you see then versus the days you do not do a water change.
You can dose right after the water change and this will keep plenty of nutrients and CO2 in the water. So the system will be more stable.
You are removing everything and re setting the aquarium each time you do a water change. By dosing thereafter, you are adding back a known amount of nutrients.
As far as the Redfield ratio, there have been many that are a poor understanding of what the ratio means.
It is an atomic ratio, they only talk about Numbers of atoms, not their molar weight.
We use weight mostly for dosing nutrients.
So 1:16 P: N Redflied Ratio(RR), is 30.97 for P and 14.01 for N.
If you convert this to weight mass, now you have 30.97/14.01 = ~ 2.2 X less than than the RR assumes.
Or about 1:7.
The aquarist have made the mistake by assuming they mean mass, not ratio of atoms. So they are 2.2 X off in their measurement.
Simple mistake, but a big error!
If you look at the N:P ratios for most aquatic plant from the research, they are 5:1 to 10:1, with an average of about 6-7:1. N:P.
The RR is not wrong really, the application was/is.
Sadly, even after pointing this out to several web sites, they still choose to keep promoting this error.
Ignorance is one thing, willful stupidy is quite another.
We should try not to be the latter
Regards,
Tom Barr