You likely have not heard about it because I often do not tell folks everything and every detail.
I'm not sure why others always use a pure super ultra rich layer that can make a huge mess if you pull things up without much care.
Just seems like common sense to me
It reduces the richness, but not the area, and it makes replanting much easier and far less messy and no troubles at all.
I am rather curious why other folks have not discussed nor tried that, but then again, I've done a lot more with sediments and testing than any other plant hobbyist over the years.
So perhaps I'm just weird and try all sorts of things trying to improve and address issues and trade offs.
I use 900 pots at the lab for herbicide test, they all use this set up and it does not make 1/10th the mess the other lab people make.
If I made the layer pure soil, then it floats and makes planting tough and I have to soak it etc.
This way It makes no mess replanting, can be used right away, needs repotting more often(every 6-9 months instead of 9-12 months, no big deal there) and less algae issues.
I think mixing it with the sand is a very wise thing to do and weighes that muddy mess down and keeps it in place.
But like I said, just seems like common sense to me to do that.
Maybe that is a reason why I have such good growth with soil tank and suggest ADA and soil based tanks+ 2-3 mm sand are similar as far as the sediment.
Perhaps the soil is less messy in some cases
I have a pot or two of the ADA As out at the lab, seems to do the same, but I have not tested both under enriched CO2 conditions etc.
Will be a good one and I'd liked to run a dozen pots for comparison and lots of CO2 to see.
I have to grow out some more Hydrilla for a the test this spring yet however.
After that, the tanks inside will be free.
Regards,
Tom Barr