Aquarium Plants - Barr Report  
Go Back   Aquarium Plants - Barr Report > Barr Report > General Plant Topics
Reload this Page Some new pics of a 350 gal tank
General Plant Topics General Plant Topics and Aquatic Life discussions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Some new pics of a 350 gal tank
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
Some new pics of a 350 gal tank - 01-17-2007, 08:45 AM

This tank is still not yet done. I have some foreground plant changes I need to add that the large plecos keep mauling. The Lobelia is taking so I'll work that in there. The A adonis (Black satan plecos, there's 4 of them in here) are about 6-8" now and uproot the plants. The Lobeia in a test spot have remained.
I have some more grouping changes planned and some different rock work planed later.

Have to work some more on a few sections, but it's coming along, note, this is after a big trim and a large water change, so it's a bit murky actually.

Standard full EI, 50-60% weekly water changes, plain flourite that's distrubed often, lots if current and filtration, wet dry etc.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg resized0108071.jpg (263.3 KB, 165 views)
File Type: jpg IMGP1570.JPG (138.7 KB, 138 views)
File Type: jpg resizedredone108079.jpg (146.9 KB, 222 views)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
01-17-2007, 08:47 AM

More pics:

Lots of fish in this tank and the system is very well balanced, standa EI and there are many fish you cannot see in the pic, the ball of Rummy's is a fast moving horde, the Cardinals do their own schooling.

I'll get a mpeg soon, a picture will never do the justice of such large high fish densities in planted tanks.




Regards,
Tom Barr
Attached Images
File Type: jpg resizedredone108074.jpg (178.6 KB, 127 views)
File Type: jpg resized108073.jpg (185.0 KB, 115 views)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
01-17-2007, 08:52 AM

More pictures:

Side view, the vermin feeding frenzy,


Regards,
Tom Barr
Attached Images
File Type: jpg resized108072.jpg (316.9 KB, 90 views)
File Type: jpg resizedredone108078.jpg (109.6 KB, 79 views)
File Type: jpg resizedredone108075.jpg (168.2 KB, 133 views)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
01-17-2007, 09:07 AM

Here's an older view

Note the Hygro leaf holes, they are not present on the new leaves, nor the older lower leaves.

This is directly due to low CO2, the tank ran out on the client's tank.
You will note that it cause the leaves closest to the the meristem to suffer, while the rest of the plant was fine.

The expression of the holes took several days after the treatment of low CO2 occured.

Often there are developmental delays in nutrient expression treatments, generally a week or so.

If this where some other nutrients issue, such as K+ or NO3, the tips would be stunted or the lower leaves would have the patterning.

Such specifric and closely related nutrient deficiency issues are common in aquatic plants. Blackened Java fern occurs after slightly low chronic CO2 after about 2-4 weeks time. Mosty of the other plants did fine during this time. Adjusting the CO2 back up and waiting a couple of weeks restored nice new leaf growth with new leaves appearing and filling in about 4-8 weeks later.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3504resize3d.jpg (53.6 KB, 141 views)
File Type: jpg 300resized 97less.jpg (87.7 KB, 89 views)
File Type: jpg IMGP1402.JPG (149.7 KB, 102 views)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
What is the species...
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
rusticitas is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Approaching Guru Status
 
rusticitas's Avatar
Location: Pennsylvania
What is the species... - 01-17-2007, 03:39 PM

Is that a Farowella(sp?) in the first post's middle picture, resting on the rock?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
01-17-2007, 05:17 PM

No, Sturistoma aureum.

About 12" long.

Regards,
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
2wheelsx2 is Offline
Subscriber
Poster
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
01-17-2007, 06:14 PM

There's a wet/dry filtration system in that tank? How are you able to manage to retain enough CO2 in that tank? How is it provided? Misting, or a reactor, or both?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
01-17-2007, 07:08 PM

You raise the overflow box water levels to about 2-3" below the surface.
Then seal the dry section of the wet/dry filter with tape or plug vent holes.

What goes in and degasses, also degasses right back in.
The deal is that it still works well because there's rapid exchange in the gas phase for the bacteria to use the O2, which is also degassed and used by bacteria in that chamber, and then the bacteria give off?

CO2, so the net use is less O2 and more CO2.
But if you vent the dry section, you will lose the CO2 quickly.
CO2 is fed directly into the return via 2 reactors and running about 800 gph through both of them.

Regards,
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
2wheelsx2 is Offline
Subscriber
Poster
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
01-17-2007, 07:49 PM

That's a great solution. Thanks for the details. I hadn't thought about sealing off the "dry" section. I guess since solubility of the CO2 is so good, it makes it work quite well.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
01-17-2007, 08:35 PM

It's no different than a cansiter filter if it's sealed.

What goes in, must come out.
Same with a canister.

It's sealed as well.
Rather simple concept

So if the dry section is sealed, why would it be any different than a canister?
If you measure the CO2 closely, it's not.
The loss is due to air exchange with an unsealed section, or due to over flow drops.

You can raise the overflow to the tank level and eliminate that as a possibility and then isolate and focus on the wet/dry section to see.

Once you have a good handle on the wet/dry section, then you go back and check the overflow response when you lower it 1", 2", 4" 12", 20" and so on.

You lose very little at 2-3", but it starts to lose CO2 at 4" or more inches depending on flow rates and mixing.

Regards,
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On

Points Per Thread View:
Points Per Thread:
Points Per Reply:



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69