Aquarium Plants - Barr Report  
Go Back   Aquarium Plants - Barr Report > Barr Report > Estimative Index
Reload this Page Seachem Equillibrium needed with hard water?
Estimative Index *** Read Only ***

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Seachem Equillibrium needed with hard water?
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
stacir is Offline
Junior Poster
Poster
Seachem Equillibrium needed with hard water? - 04-14-2008, 09:54 PM

If I am following the EI dosing method, and I have very hard well water, do I still need to use the equillibrium?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
VaughnH is Online
Lifetime Charter Member
Approaching Guru Status
 
VaughnH's Avatar
04-15-2008, 12:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by stacir View Post
If I am following the EI dosing method, and I have very hard well water, do I still need to use the equillibrium?

If your hard water has a GH around 6 or higher, you don't need Equilibrium. But, if the "hard well water" just has a high KH, you may want to use Equilibrium to get enough calcium and magnesium for the plants.


Hoppy
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
04-15-2008, 01:05 AM

If you can either test or ask the water dept about what is the GH made out of generally, then you may not.

Some places have high Mg, some moderate etc, some, hardly any at all.
Most places have high Ca, and in some cases hardly any Mg at all.

So adding MgSO4, epsom salt, might be all you need in that case.

If the Mg is high and the Ca low, CaSO4(Gypsum) or CaCl2(Pool Calcium hardness increaser- Lesilie's pool supply, Home Depot etc) might be better.

Regards,
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
shane is Offline
Lifetime Charter Member
Approaching Guru Status
04-15-2008, 07:22 AM

What is considered high Mg and Ca in a planted aquarium?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Barr View Post
If you can either test or ask the water dept about what is the GH made out of generally, then you may not.

Some places have high Mg, some moderate etc, some, hardly any at all.
Most places have high Ca, and in some cases hardly any Mg at all.

So adding MgSO4, epsom salt, might be all you need in that case.

If the Mg is high and the Ca low, CaSO4(Gypsum) or CaCl2(Pool Calcium hardness increaser- Lesilie's pool supply, Home Depot etc) might be better.

Regards,
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
04-15-2008, 08:57 AM

I'm not sure how high ppm's are considered "bad". Low, about less than 1-2 ppms for either. A wide range in other words and adding a bit more to account for ratio uptake based on N can help get a rough estimation how much to dose.

Regards,
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
remy56 is Offline
Subscriber
Poster
04-15-2008, 01:13 PM

I live in Maine ...the GH and KH are both very low (if only 1 drop changes the water color, is the value considered 1 or zero?).

If I use Equilibrium for GH what should be done about the KH?

What are good vallues for a low light, Excel tank?

Thanks.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
04-15-2008, 09:52 PM

I really do not add anything for KH.
Never really have.
I've had tap water going from GH to 24 down to 1, and KH's from 0.8 to about 15.

GH are plant nutrients, KH, as long as you have enough carbon, is not.
KH can be used as a source of carbon, but that's not a situation you want.

Regards,
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
remy56 is Offline
Subscriber
Poster
04-16-2008, 02:02 AM

Tom,

Does that mean there is no real need for me to continue to do KH testing?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
mrkookm is Offline
Subscriber
Valued Contributor
 
mrkookm's Avatar
04-16-2008, 08:02 PM

Doing a test for reference is fine but from there on it really isn't needed.

Last edited by mrkookm : 04-16-2008 at 08:07 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Tom Barr is Offline
Administrator
Admin
 
Tom Barr's Avatar
04-16-2008, 09:06 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by remy56 View Post
Tom,

Does that mean there is no real need for me to continue to do KH testing?

Not a bad idea to check it every few months.

Regards
Tom Barr
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On

Points Per Thread View:
Points Per Thread:
Points Per Reply:



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66