Aquarium Plants - Barr Report  
Go Back   Aquarium Plants - Barr Report > Barr Report > Estimative Index
Reload this Page How to make NO3 and PO4 reference solutions(repost from Left C)
Estimative Index *** Read Only ***

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Crazy Loaches is Offline
Guru Class Expert
Poster
Location: Ohio
02-06-2008, 08:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnH View Post
If you want to use weight instead of volume...
Other way around, but thanks for the tips, that might actually work out, just takes some extra testing. I do already have weight per cup measurements, I've calculated out about how many pounds of ferts I would need for a year at my current dosing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by swylie View Post
If you're feeling really thrifty and have a loose sense of ethics you could certainly buy a digital kitchen scale at Target or Walmart, use it, and then return it. Those scales can be precise to the gram. You only need to make a reference solution once, right?

I know exactly what you mean, and I've never done anything like that before

But as I stated I have a gram-accurate scale. What this is calling for looks to need maybe a hundredth of a gram sensitivity. I could go out and get a new scale its not really a money issue I guess, I just feel like it’s a waste since I already have a scale that I rarely use, now I would have two.

I guess volume is simply more variable than weight for a reliable measure? If were taking about not using volume because its only marginally more inaccurate than couldn’t we use a larger sample like I mention with a gallon jug of DI water? Lets say what we need happens to be very small and hard to judge by volume, like 1/32 tsp. So then take a larger sample like 1 tsp, put it in a gal, then using something accurate like a 10ml syringe, extract 10 ml out (or whatever it would be to get back down to the 1/32 tsp figure) and start your actual solution. Unless volume is just a lot more variable than I realize.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
swylie is Offline
Prolific Poster
Poster
02-06-2008, 08:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Loaches View Post
But as I stated I have a gram-accurate scale. What this is calling for looks to need maybe a hundredth of a gram sensitivity. I could go out and get a new scale its not really a money issue I guess, I just feel like it’s a waste since I already have a scale that I rarely use, now I would have two.

I guess volume is simply more variable than weight for a reliable measure? If were taking about not using volume because its only marginally more inaccurate than couldn’t we use a larger sample like I mention with a gallon jug of DI water? Lets say what we need happens to be very small and hard to judge by volume, like 1/32 tsp. So then take a larger sample like 1 tsp, put it in a gal, then using something accurate like a 10ml syringe, extract 10 ml out (or whatever it would be to get back down to the 1/32 tsp figure) and start your actual solution. Unless volume is just a lot more variable than I realize.

Shows how much I pay attention... The gentleman already has a scale. Hmm... Well, in that case, consider using the scale to measure your water. At standard temperature and pressure water weighs 1 gram per ml, and your scale is probably much more precise than a gallon jug or a nalgene bottle or glass measuring pitcher. A 10 ml syringe is probably better than measuring 10 grams of water on the scale though.

Your idea of using larger masses and then diluting the samples is called "serial dilution" and it's definitely the best way forward. You can make very precise dilutions with a method like you described, and it allows you to measure in reasonable units: 10 ml, 100 g, etc. I'm sure Tom does serial dilutions in his sleep.

If you use the tools you have and the techniques you described you'll be able to make a reference solution that's more precise than your test kit.

Just remember that a 1:10 dillution is 10 ml + 90 ml = 100 ml, not 10 + 100.

Last edited by swylie : 02-06-2008 at 08:34 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On

Points Per Thread View:
Points Per Thread:
Points Per Reply:



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69