Tom,
not P:N, but PO4:NO3 ratio.
You Did,
over here.
60 grams KNO3 gives NO3~37.2.
18 grams KH2PO4 gives PO4~12.56.
So PO4:NO3~2.96 (depends on accuracy of calculations).
More over, for 20gal tank this gives NO3~42ppm. Isn’t it too much?
I guess Luis Moniz
here had doubts too.
Help, please.
VaughnH,
I care of PO4:NO3 ratio because of a Redfield ratio and Rubisco.
More PO4 will not harm at all…
until everything is ok with CO2. As soon as CO2 drops or liquid ferts under dosed plants have no enough N-pool for Rubisco to adapt for assimilation lower CO2 concentrations, and you have algae bloom much
more and much
faster, than when you have a more reasonable PO4:NO3 ratio, substrate loaded with nutrients, and less ferts in water column. This gives more Stability and easier Management, I guess.
Especially indicated problems evident with lean substrate.
Rich substrate (CEC+organics with low lability), together with “peak method” (see PJAN and Ole's data) allows dosing less nutrients in water column and better CO2 assimilation (due to better morning and all day Rubisco activation with gradually increasing light) makes ADA’s system
quite different from EI/PPS-pro in terms of Stability and Management. This is ADA's "trick".
PO4
along is not a bad thing as we all here know well.
But here I have gone far off top…