Quote:
Originally Posted by girthvader
good to know. I only asked because I happened to see it when I was looking at the Seachem website and their dosing chart and wondered if there was any validity to it. I dose qdaily but thought perhaps I was doing it wrong. I actually dont follow the EI. I guess im more PPs in terms of testing and keeping levels where I have seen the best results. Although I do dose my CSM+B a little heavier, but I keep my Macs in standard ranges.
ziggy
|
That my friend is not PPS
Test kits are far far far from the exclusive domain of PPS and if you read that whole thing, it almost sounds like Edward invented using testing kits to dose planted tanks.
Clearly that's not the case.
You do water changes, you dose, you use test kits.
This is much more in accordance with the old version:
References
1997-1998
This pre dates PPS by 8-10 years.
PPS has a Excel chart to enter the data.
PPS suggest calibration of test kits(Seldom done by many users)
PPS suggest no water changes are needed.
None of these methods are the exclusive domain of PPS.
It's the same stuff with a new name.
Folks do not have to do water changes, but they do help and they are very effective at resetting a tank. Every winning scaper I've met/well known scaper does them, a lot of them and frequently.
I can eyeball a tank for many weeks without using test kits by watching the plants, they are much much better to watch and look at than a test kit reading. Most experts will tell you the same.
Think about that for awhile.
Spend your time doing that, scaping, gardening, or testing? I've learned a lot more by watching plants in my successes than watching test kits.
Regards,
Tom Barr