I've wondered how the bubble sizing would effect things.
The larger bubbles would suggest a few things:
More notion of the gas phase and more disturbance of the boundary layer on a plant. Tiny bubbles might not be the best thing oddly.
I think using a DO meter is about the best method to measure the pearling though.
That's a good standard folks cannot argue much with in terms of influencing anything other than growth. Well, some may try
But I think at the end of the day, you and most folks know when the tank is doing better and less algae, more plant growth and what real pearling looks like.
But if you want more confidence, a O2 meter will certainly help.
Even that has an issue with O2 levels since it assumes that all the O2 is dissolving that's produced by the plants.
Clearly its not
Some escapes above.
But that is true for the other gases as well and when comparing things, it'll be relative measures, not absolute.
So say a measure of:
35% increase in O2 with a SE of 4.6%
Versus
46% increase in O2 with a SE of 5.9%
With one vs another mist method is what you can suggest.
So you could say these are significant differences between treatments in the CO2 mist or exposure to air methods.
I have a CAL Labs in line unit sitting here but will not get around to adding till after Feb 8th or so.
Regards,
Tom Barr